Dispel the Darkness Ministries
Inoculating Christians Against Cults

Menu

Latest News

In the April 15, 2010 "study issue" of the Watchtower magazine, the doctrine of the "generation" has changed yet again. Until 1995, the "generation" was defined as that group of people who had been alive in 1914. It was taught that at least some members of that generation would see the "end of the system of things" and the institution of God's Kingdom on earth.

According to the new teaching, the "generation" is now to be understood differently. The magazine says, "How, then, are we to understand Jesus’ words about “this generation”? He evidently meant that the lives of the anointed whowere on hand when the sign began to become evident in 1914 would overlap with the lives of other anointed ones who would see the start of the great tribulation." So now the new teaching is that those whose lives overlapped with the members of the 1914 generation will see the end come within their lifetimes. A few of the 1914 generation are still alive, though they are almost 100 years old.

According to the Watchtower's new teaching, therefore, anyone who is alive now, even small children, can comprise part of the "generation" that will see the end. It seems quite possible under those circumstances that the Watchtower may have bought itself another 60 or 70 years before this new prophecy fails. Unfortunately, the former teaching about the "generation" was presented as "the Creator's promise" and "Jehovah's prophetic word." So the JW leadership has already branded itself as a false prophet, and no person who wishes to follow Christ should give them credence (Deut. 18:20-22).
Did Paul Rescind Baptism?

Do you believe that the command of Christ to baptize (Matt. 28:19) was rescinded by Paul in 1 Corinthians 1:17?

At Matthew 28:19, Christ gave His disciples a command that has come to be known as the “Great Commission.” He said, "Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age."  The wording of the command is such that it appears to be intended universally, for all Christians in all times and circumstances. Historically, the church has regarded it as being so, and as a result, Christianity has always been an evangelizing religion.

At 1 Corinthians 1:17, Paul wrote, "For Christ did not send me to baptize, but to preach the gospel-not with words of human wisdom, lest the cross of Christ be emptied of its power." Some have wondered whether Paul was here saying that baptism is unnecessary for Christians. The immediate context of this verse does not seem to indicate that Paul’s intent was to rescind Christ’s command regarding baptism. Paul was discussing the matter of factions that had arisen in the church, with some professing to be followers of Paul, Apollos, Cephas, etc. He is making the point that all Christians should be followers of Christ, and not of any man. It was Christ, he argues, Who died for them and in Whose name they were baptized. He expresses gratitude that he did not baptize very many, so that no one could claim that they were baptized in Paul’s name. The issue was not whether Christians should be baptized, but in whose name. When Paul writes, “Christ did not send me to baptize,” he is not saying that baptism should not be done, but that Paul’s primary work was that of preaching Christ, not particularly of baptizing. Because of this, his desire was to lead men to Christ – not to any human teacher. When people who had received Christ were baptized, they would become His followers, not followers of the one who had preached to them.

That Paul did not intend to do away with baptism is also evident in that he speaks of baptism, including his own, in a positive way in other texts, giving no indication that the practice might be discontinued (Romans 6:3,4; Galatians 3:27; Ephesians 4:5; Colossians 2:12). Finally, the testimony of history is that baptism continued in the early church, and has never been abandoned, even up to the present day. Had Paul truly intended to rescind the command to baptize, no such continuity of practice would be evident.